Freed v. USA

Freed v. USA

Petitioner:	Nicholas Todd Freed
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	3:2017cv01666
Filed:	June 23, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office:	Dallas Office
County:	Dallas
Presiding Judge:	Sam A Lindsay
Presiding Judge:	Irma Carrillo Ramirez
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 21, 2020	Filing 41 ORDER: The Court Accepts 40 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 39 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Nicholas Todd Freed. The court certifies that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. 39 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on appeal re 38 Notice of Appeal is denied. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 4/21/2020) (svc)
January 17, 2020	Filing 36 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: On 2/2/2019, United States Magistrate Judge Irma Ramirez entered the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge ("Report") (Doc. 31 ), recommending that the court deny wit h prejudice Movant Nicholas Todd Freed's ("Movant") Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody ("§ 2255 Motion") (Doc. 2 ), filed 6/23/2017. The court det ermines that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, accepts them, as supplemented by this opinion, as of those of the court, and denies with prejudice Movant's § 2255 Motion (Doc. 2 ). (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 1/17/2020) (ctf)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 21, 2020

Filing 41 ORDER: The Court Accepts 40 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 39 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Nicholas Todd Freed. The court certifies that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. 39 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on appeal re 38 Notice of Appeal is denied. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 4/21/2020) (svc)

January 17, 2020

Filing 36 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: On 2/2/2019, United States Magistrate Judge Irma Ramirez entered the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge ("Report") (Doc. 31 ), recommending that the court deny wit h prejudice Movant Nicholas Todd Freed's ("Movant") Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody ("§ 2255 Motion") (Doc. 2 ), filed 6/23/2017. The court det ermines that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, accepts them, as supplemented by this opinion, as of those of the court, and denies with prejudice Movant's § 2255 Motion (Doc. 2 ). (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 1/17/2020) (ctf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Freed v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Nicholas Todd Freed
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?