Owens v. Neovia Logistics LLC et al
| Sean Owens |
| Neovia Logistics LLC |
| 3:2017cv01719 |
| June 29, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| A. Joe Fish |
| Renee Harris Toliver |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
125
ORDER ACCEPTING 121 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The objections are overruled, and the court ACCEPTS the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 3/28/2019) (mla)
|
|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 24 Joint MOTION to Change Venue and Permit Amendment by Plaintiff filed by Sean Owens. ORDERED that the Parties' Agreed Joint Motion to Transfer Venue and Permit Amendment by Plaintiff (Dkt. #24) is hereby GRANTED in part, and this case is transferred in its entirety to the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division. The request to file an amended complaint should be addressed with the Northern District of Texas. The Clerk is directed to transfer this case to United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 6/29/2017. (kls, ) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 6/29/2017.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
