Gaines v. The City of Dallas

Gaines v. The City of Dallas

Plaintiff:	Lydia M Gaines
Defendant:	The City of Dallas
Case Number:	3:2017cv01867
Filed:	July 14, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office:	Dallas Office
County:	Dallas
Presiding Judge:	Sam A Lindsay
Presiding Judge:	Irma Carrillo Ramirez
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 18, 2019	Filing 35 Order Accepting 34 Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The court grants Defendant The City of Dallas's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Federal Complaint (Doc. 27 ) and dismisses with prejudice Plaintiff's defamation and ADEA claims for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The court certifies that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 1/18/2019) (axm)
May 22, 2018	Filing 25 ORDER accepting 20 Findings and Recommendations; denying without prejudice 14 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss; granting 21 Motion for Extension of Time to File Amended Complaint and extending deadline to May 30, 2018; and denying 22 Moti on for Scheduling Order. No further extensions of this deadline will be granted. Failure to file an amended complaint by this date will result in dismissal without prejudice of this action by Plaintiff for failure to comply with a court order or prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 5/22/2018) (chmb)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 18, 2019

Filing 35 Order Accepting 34 Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The court grants Defendant The City of Dallas's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Federal Complaint (Doc. 27 ) and dismisses with prejudice Plaintiff's defamation and ADEA claims for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The court certifies that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 1/18/2019) (axm)

May 22, 2018

Filing 25 ORDER accepting 20 Findings and Recommendations; denying without prejudice 14 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss; granting 21 Motion for Extension of Time to File Amended Complaint and extending deadline to May 30, 2018; and denying 22 Moti on for Scheduling Order. No further extensions of this deadline will be granted. Failure to file an amended complaint by this date will result in dismissal without prejudice of this action by Plaintiff for failure to comply with a court order or prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 5/22/2018) (chmb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gaines v. The City of Dallas
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lydia M Gaines
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: The City of Dallas
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?