Bhombal v Irving Independent School District et al
| Iqbal Bhombal |
| Irving Independent School District and Lindsay Sanders |
| 3:2017cv02583 |
| September 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| Jane J. Boyle |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 49 Motion to Dismiss and DISMISSES all of the Bhombals' claims. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 6/28/2019) (epm)
|
|
Filing
22
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 10 Motion to Dismiss, 11 Motion to Dismiss filed by Lindsay Sanders. The Court DISMISSES with prejudice Bhombal's § 1983 claims for violations of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments; Bhombal' s § 1983 claims for violations of his Fourteenth Amendment rights; Bhombal's Title VI claims brought individually, against Principal Sanders, and sounding in religious discrimination; and Bhombals's claims for intentional infliction of emotionaldistress against IISD and Principal Sanders. The Court DISMISSES without prejudice Bhombal's § 1983 claims for violations of the Fourteenth Amendment and Bhombal's Title VI claim on Z.B.'s behalf against IISD for race-based discrimination. If Bhombal wishes to replead these claims, he must file an amended complaint no later than 6/8/2018. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 5/9/2018) (rekc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
