Caruth, III et al v. Chubb Lloyd's Insurance Company of Texas et al
| William W Caruth, III and Minnie A Caruth |
| Chubb Lloyd's Insurance Company of Texas and Cynthia Morgan |
| 3:2017cv02748 |
| October 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| A. Joe Fish |
| David L. Horan |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The court DENIES both Chubb's 21 motion to strike and Morgan's 23 motion to dismiss. Because it is now clear that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this dispute, this case is REMANDED to the 298th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas. The clerk shall mail a certified copy of this memorandum opinion and order to the district clerk of Dallas County, Texas. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 8/16/2018) (zkc)
|
|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 10 Motion to Dismiss, denying 15 Motion to Remand. William W. Caruth, III and Minnie A. Caruth ("the Caruths") shall have leave to amend their complaint to cure -- if they can -- the pleading defects described above, provided that the Caruths' amended complaint is filed and served no later than 4/23/2018. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 4/9/2018) (axm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
