Orchestra Technology Inc v. Telcentris Inc
Plaintiff: Orchestra Technology Inc
Defendant: Telcentris Inc and Telcentris Inc doing business as Voxox
Case Number: 3:2017cv02827
Filed: October 16, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: Jane J Boyle
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER: On 6/14/2018, Plaintiff filed its Agreed Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice. Doc. #15 . Therefore, the Court ORDERS that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Case, Doc. #13 , is DENIED as moot. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 6/15/2018) (sss)
June 14, 2018 Filing 15 Agreed MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice filed by Orchestra Technology Inc (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Walsh, John)
June 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER: If Defendant objects to Plaintiff's motion and/or entry of the Agreed Consent Judgment, it must file a response with the Court no later than 6/14/2018 that explains why the Court should not enter the Agreed Consent Judgment. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 6/7/2018) (rekc)
June 6, 2018 Filing 13 MOTION to Reopen Case to Enter Settlement Agreement and to Enter an Agreed Judgment filed by Orchestra Technology Inc with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Settlement Agreement, #2 Exhibit(s) Agreed Judgment with Offset, #3 Proposed Order) (Walsh, John)
May 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: The Court DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's claims. If Plaintiff does not respond to this Order by 6/13/2018, the Court will dismiss with prejudice Plaintiff's claims. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 5/14/2018) (sss)
May 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Order to Show Cause. Show Cause Response due by 5/8/2018. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 5/1/2018) (epm)
November 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #9 Second Agreed Stipulation Regarding Extension of Time. Defendant's answer or responsive pleading is now due January 26, 2018. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 11/28/2017) (chmb)
November 27, 2017 Filing 9 Second STIPULATION Regarding Extension of Time by Telcentris Inc. (Clark, Brian)
November 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #7 Agreed Stipulation Regarding Extension of Time. Defendant's answer or responsive pleading is now due November 27, 2017. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 11/13/2017) (chmb)
November 9, 2017 Filing 7 Agreed STIPULATION Regarding Extension of Time by Telcentris Inc. (Clark, Brian)
October 19, 2017 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Telcentris Inc. (rekc)
October 19, 2017 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to issue Summons in a Civil Action filed by Orchestra Technology Inc. (Walsh, John)
October 19, 2017 Filing 4 ***DISREGARD - ATTORNEY REFILED AS #5 *** Request for Clerk to issue Summons in a Civil Action filed by Orchestra Technology Inc. (Walsh, John) Modified on 10/19/2017 (rekc).
October 16, 2017 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Orchestra Technology Inc. (Walsh, John)
October 16, 2017 Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ran)
October 16, 2017 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Orchestra Technology, Inc. filed by Orchestra Technology, Inc.. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-8739401) Summons(es) not requested at this time. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Walsh, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Orchestra Technology Inc v. Telcentris Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Telcentris Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Telcentris Inc doing business as Voxox
Represented By: Brian W Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Orchestra Technology Inc
Represented By: John P Walsh
Represented By: William Kim Wade
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?