Lindsley v. TRT Holdings, Inc. et al
Sarah Lindsley |
TRT Holdings Inc and Omni Hotels & Resorts |
3:2017cv02942 |
October 25, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Dallas Office |
Dallas |
Sam R Cummings |
Civil Rights: Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 288 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER granting 282 MOTION to Stay Equitable Relief Pending Appeal with Supporting Brief; denying 281 MOTION to Alter Judgment . (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 12/18/2023) (oyh) |
Filing 263 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 246 Motion to Enter Judgment on the Verdict, denying 240 Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, denying 243 Motion to Enter Judgment on the Verdict or for a New Trial. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 10/24/2023) (axm) |
Filing 173 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part denying in part 152 , 153 motions for summary judgment. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 3/18/2022) (mjr) |
Filing 166 Memorandum Opinion and Order Grants in part, Denies in Part 152 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Omni Hotels Management Corporation, 153 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by TRT Holdings Inc. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 1/13/2022) (ndt) |
Filing 121 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 73 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Lindsley's claims against Omni. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 12/2/2019) (mla) |
Filing 111 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Based on the aforementioned reasons, the Court finds that Lindsley has not met her burden of satisfying the requirements of Rule 23 on her motion for class certification (Doc. 49 ). The Court therefore DENIES Lindsl ey's motion (Doc. 49). Because Lindsley's motion has been denied, theCourt also DENIES as moot Defendants' motions to strike related to Lindsley's class-certification motion (Docs. 55 & 56 ). (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 7/1/2019) (ndt) |
Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS TRT's 21 Motion and dismisses Lindsley's Title VII, FMLA and Texas Labor Code claims without prejudice. But the Court DENIES TRT's motion to dismiss Lindsley's EPA claim. Lindsley must amend her complaint within 30 days of this order. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 7/10/2018) (zkc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.