Family Rehabilitation Inc v. Hargan et al
Plaintiff: Family Rehabilitation Inc
Defendant: Eric D Hargan and Seema Verma
Case Number: 3:2017cv03008
Filed: October 31, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
County: Ellis
Presiding Judge: Ed Kinkeade
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 45 U.S.C. ยง 1395 Railroads: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 96 Memorandum Opinion and Order - Before the Court are (1) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment on Its Application for Permanent Injunctive Relief (Doc. No. 79) and (2) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 82). The Court considered the motions, briefs, responses, replies, and applicable law. Because the Court finds that denying Family Rehab a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") prior to implementing recoupment that would result in the end of its business violates Family Rehab's right to procedural due process, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment on its Application for Permanent Injunctive Relief. Because the Court grants Family Rehab's motion but finds no grounds for an ultra vires action or mandamus relief, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 1/15/2020) (chmb)
June 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 52 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS the 34 motion for preliminary injunction. The Court ORDERS that the Defendants are restrained and enjoined from withholding Medicare payments and receivables to Family Rehab to effectuate the recoupm ent of the alleged overpayments in the underlying claims until such time as an ALJ has heard and rendered a decision on Family Rehab's appeal of CMS's overpayment determination. This preliminary injunction does not enjoin Defendants from withholding Medicare payments for any new alleged claims of overpayments that may occur in the intervening time. In its discretion, the Court waives the bond requirement for Family Rehab. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 6/28/2018) (axm)
June 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER - Before the Court is Plaintiff Family Rehabilitation, Inc.'s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No. 34). The Court GRANTS Family Rehab's motion for temporary restraining order and ORDERS that C MS is restrained and enjoined from withholding Medicare payments to Family Rehab to effectuate the recoupment of any alleged overpayments. In its discretion, the Court waives the bond requirement for Family Rehab. See Kaepa, Inc. v. Achilles Corp., 7 6 F.3d 624, 628 (5th Cir. 1996). This temporary restraining order shall expire fourteen (14) days after the date and hour of its issuance, unless otherwise extended by the Court. The Court will set a hearing for preliminary injunction in a separate order. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 6/4/2018) (chmb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Family Rehabilitation Inc v. Hargan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Family Rehabilitation Inc
Represented By: James Alphonso Cox
Represented By: Rebekah N Plowman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eric D Hargan
Represented By: Brian Walters Stoltz-DOJ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Seema Verma
Represented By: Brian Walters Stoltz-DOJ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?