Hudgins v Ameriprise

Petitioner: Sandra Josephine Hudgins
Respondent: Ameriprise Financial Services Inc
Case Number: 3:2017cv03125
Filed: November 13, 2017
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Office: Dallas Office
County: Collin
Presiding Judge: Barbara M.G. Lynn
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 09:1
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 30, 2018 25 Opinion or Order of the Court Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 10 Counter MOTION to Confirm Arbitration Award. The Court declines to vacate the Award. Hudgins's Application to Vacate Arbitration Award is denied. By separate judgment, the Award dated 10/13/2017 will be confirmed. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 9/30/2018) (epm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hudgins v Ameriprise
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Sandra Josephine Hudgins
Represented By: Chad A Norcross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ameriprise Financial Services Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?