Ford Global Technologies, LLC v. New World International Inc. et al
| Ford Global Technologies LLC |
| New World International Inc, Auto Lighthouse Plus LLC and United Commerce Centers Inc |
| 3:2017cv03201 |
| November 22, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| David C Godbey |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
383
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court grants Ford's 350 motion for attorneys' fees and costs, but denies Ford's motion with respect to expert fees and any upward adjustment of the lodestar amount. The Court grants Ford's 352 Motion for Injunction, but modifies the permanent injunction to only include the four remaining unexpired patents. The Court likewise grants Ford's requests for additional recovery of profits and pre and postjudgment interest. The Court denies New World's 355 motions for judgment as a matter of law and 358 for new trial. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 4/9/2019) (mla)
|
|
Filing
320
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court grants FGTL's 227 motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of infringement, establishing liability in FGTL's favor. The Court denies New World's 215 motion for summary judgment on the issues of damages, patent invalidity, unenforceability, and noninfringement. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 11/5/2018) (zkc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
