Crayton v. State of Washington

Petitioner: Lee Darrell Crayton
Respondent: State of Washington
Case Number: 3:2017cv03304
Filed: December 5, 2017
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Office: Dallas Office
County: Bowie
Presiding Judge: Jane J. Boyle
Referring Judge: Renee Harris Toliver
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 31, 2018 12 Opinion or Order of the Court Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations and Denying Certificate of Appealability: 10 Findings and Recommendations on 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Lee Darrell Crayton is DISMISSED sua sponte as duplicative. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 1/31/2018) (svc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crayton v. State of Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Lee Darrell Crayton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?