MCR Oil Tools LLC v. Spex Offshore Ltd et al
Plaintiff: MCR Oil Tools LLC
Defendant: Spex Group US LLC, Spex Engineering (UK) Ltd and Spex Offshore Ltd
Counter_claimant: Spex Group US LLC
Counter_defendant: MCR Oil Tools LLC
Case Number: 3:2017cv03510
Filed: December 28, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: Barbara M.G. Lynn
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 35 Memorandum Opinion and Order granting in part and denying in part 10 Motion to Remand. Because the Court finds that federal subject matter jurisdiction is lacking, this case is REMANDED to the 95th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas. The Court DENIES MCR's request for attorney's fees, costs, and expenses, because Defendants' arguments in support of removal were not objectively unreasonable. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 2/16/2018) (zkc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MCR Oil Tools LLC v. Spex Offshore Ltd et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MCR Oil Tools LLC
Represented By: Blake L Beckham
Represented By: Frank Gilstrap
Represented By: Frank W Hill
Represented By: Jose M Portela
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Spex Group US LLC
Represented By: Craig D Dillard
Represented By: Steven C Lockhart
Represented By: Terrell R Miller
Represented By: Jason Paul Sharp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Spex Engineering (UK) Ltd
Represented By: Craig D Dillard
Represented By: Steven C Lockhart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Spex Offshore Ltd
Represented By: Craig D Dillard
Represented By: Steven C Lockhart
Represented By: Terrell R Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Spex Group US LLC
Represented By: Craig D Dillard
Represented By: Steven C Lockhart
Represented By: Terrell R Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: MCR Oil Tools LLC
Represented By: Blake L Beckham
Represented By: Frank Gilstrap
Represented By: Frank W Hill
Represented By: Jose M Portela
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?