Block v. Interoil Corporation et al
| Kim C Block |
| Interoil Corporation, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Michael Hession, Christopher Finlayson, Chee Keong Yap, Dr. Ellis Armstrong, Ford Grant Nicholson, Isikeli Reuben Taureka, Sir Wilson Kamit and Sir Rabbie L Namaliu |
| 3:2018cv00007 |
| January 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Anderson |
| Ed Kinkeade |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Because the plaintiff cannot meet all three of the Infusion factors, and evidence already docketed and taken into account by the Court is not "new evidence" for the purposes of Rule 59(e), the Court DENIES the plaintiff's Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend its judgment [Doc. No. 56 ]. All relief not expressly granted is denied. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 2/12/2020) (ctf)
|
|
Filing
53
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court defers to the ruling of the Supreme Court of Yukon as a matter of international comity, and dismisses Plaintiff's Amended Complaint in its entirety. The Court need not address the remaining arguments raised by the Corporate Defendants in their Motion, or the separate grounds for dismissal raised by the Director Defendants in their Motion to Dismiss. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 3/15/2019) (zkc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
