Mercury Operating LLC et al v. Seidel
| Scott Seidel |
| Harlin D Hale and Case Admin Sup |
| Aeon Operating Inc |
| Mercury Operating LLC |
| 3:2018cv00008 |
| January 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| Sam A Lindsay |
| Karen Gren Scholer |
| Bankruptcy: Appeal 28 USC 158 |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: This case is dismissed with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 7/30/2018) (epm)
|
| Filing 10 Agreed MOTION to Dismiss filed by Mercury Operating LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order of Dismissal) (Olson, Dennis) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER ON CLOSING DOCUMENTS: It is ORDERED that, on or before 7/27/2018, all parties shall file with the Court all papers necessary for the closing of this case and its removal from the active docket of this Court. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 6/25/2018) (sss)
|
| Filing 8 Appellant's REPLY BRIEF by Mercury Operating LLC. (Olson, Dennis) |
| Filing 7 Appellee's BRIEF by Scott Seidel. (Foley, Nicholas) |
| Filing 6 Appellant's BRIEF by Mercury Operating LLC. (Olson, Dennis) |
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant's Brief. Appellant Brief due by 3/16/2018. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 3/12/2018) (mcrd)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Karen Gren Scholer for all further proceedings per Special Order 3-318. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 3/8/2018) (chmb)
|
| Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Appellant's Brief filed by Mercury Operating LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Appellant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline to File Brief) (Olson, Dennis) |
| Filing 2 Notice of transmission of bankruptcy record on appeal for #bankruptcy case number 17-03028. Pursuant to #Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8010, the bankruptcy clerk has transmitted the record on appeal to the U.S. District Court. See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8018 for information on briefing times. (Attachments: #1 Mini Record Vol. 1, #2 Appellant Record Vol. 2, #3 Appellee Record Vol. 3) (Blanco - TXNB, Juan) |
| Filing 1 Pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8003(d), the bankruptcy clerk has transmitted the notice of appeal filed in #bankruptcy case number 17-03028 and the notice of appeal has now been docketed in the district court in case 3:18-cv-8. (The filing fee has been paid in the Bankruptcy Court.) Pursuant to #Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8009, before the record on appeal can be assembled and filed in the district court, designations of items to be included in the record on appeal and statements of issues must be filed in the bankruptcy case. If a sealed document is designated, the designating party must file a motion in the district court case for the document to be accepted under seal. See also #District Court Local Bankruptcy Rule 8012.1. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: #Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Notice of appeal and supporting documentation) (Whitaker - TXNB, Sheniqua) |
| New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. (axm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
