Silva v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID

Petitioner: Auturo Silva
Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Case Number: 3:2018cv00049
Filed: January 9, 2018
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Office: Dallas Office
County: Freestone
Presiding Judge: Sam A Lindsay
Referring Judge: Irma Carrillo Ramirez
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 4, 2018 8 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: Because the petitioner has now paid the filing fee, and the 2/26/2018 findings, conclusions, and recommendation have not yet been accepted, they are hereby VACATED, and the Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, received 1/9/2018 (doc. 5 ), is DEEMED MOOT. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 4/4/2018) (mcrd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Silva v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Auturo Silva
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?