Pizza Inn Inc v. Clairday
Plaintiff: Pizza Inn Inc
Defendant: Bob Clairday
Counter_claimant: Bob Clairday
Counter_defendant: Pizza Inn Inc
Case Number: 3:2018cv00221
Filed: January 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: David C Godbey
Nature of Suit: Franchise
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 73 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court denies Pizza Inn's renewed 70 motion for judgment as a matter of law. The Court sustains Pizza Inn's 68 objection and taxes $2,558.78 in court costs against Pizza Inn. Finally, the Court gran ts Clairday's 67 motion for attorneys' fees and awards $80,257 now and a contingent fee of $35,000 if Pizza Inn unsuccessfully appeals the judgment. The Court orders that Pizza Inn make payment of the awarded court costs and attorneys' fees within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, unless superseded on appeal. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 11/4/2019) (mla)
March 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 64 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: This Order addresses Pizza Inn, Inc.'s Rule 50 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law 63 , as well as constituting the Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law on the issue of equitable intervention. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 3/1/2019) (zkc)
February 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 48 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court denies Pizza Inn's motion for summary judgment on its claim for declaratory judgment. The Court likewise denies Pizza Inn's mot ion as to Clairday's claims for breach of contract and declaratory judgment. The Court, however, grants Pizza Inn's motion for summary judgment on Clairday's claims for violations of the AFPA. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 2/8/2019) (zkc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pizza Inn Inc v. Clairday
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pizza Inn Inc
Represented By: Kiran Babu Talluri
Represented By: Cody L Towns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bob Clairday
Represented By: Michael R Goldman
Represented By: Robert Thompson, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Bob Clairday
Represented By: Michael R Goldman
Represented By: Robert Thompson, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Pizza Inn Inc
Represented By: Kiran Babu Talluri
Represented By: Cody L Towns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?