Axcess Broadcast Services Inc v. Raycom Media Inc
Axcess Broadcast Services Inc and Axcess Broadcast Services Inc doing business as The Axcess Group |
Raycom Media, Inc and Raycom Media Inc |
ADR Provider |
3:2018cv00345 |
February 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Dallas Office |
Dallas |
Ed Kinkeade |
Contract: Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
Filing 30 Agreed MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice by Axcess Broadcast Services Inc. (Jonas, Sandra) Modified to add motion event on 10/31/2018 (zkc). |
Filing 29 Alternative Dispute Resolution Summary filed by ADR Provider. Attorneys in Attendance: Jessica Mason; Terrell Miller; Paul Watler. Prv Fee: $ $4990. Outcome of ADR: Settled as a result of ADR. (Morgan, Cecilia) |
|
|
Filing 26 MOTION to Compel AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Axcess Broadcast Services Inc with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Exhibit(s) D, #5 Exhibit(s) E, #6 Exhibit(s) F, #7 Exhibit(s) G, #8 Exhibit(s) H, #9 Exhibit(s) I, #10 Exhibit(s) J, #11 Exhibit(s) K, #12 Exhibit(s) L, #13 Exhibit(s) M, #14 Exhibit(s) N, #15 Exhibit(s) O, #16 Exhibit(s) P, #17 Proposed Order) (Jonas, Sandra) |
|
Filing 24 MOTION to Compel Discovery Responses from Plaintiff filed by Raycom Media Inc with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Appendix in Support) (Marsh, Lindsey) |
|
Filing 22 REPLY filed by Raycom Media Inc re: #14 MOTION for Leave to File Defendant's First Amended Answer and Original Counterclaim (Marsh, Lindsey) |
Filing 21 Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct filed by Axcess Broadcast Services Inc (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Jonas, Sandra) |
Filing 20 REPLY filed by Axcess Broadcast Services Inc re: #15 First MOTION for Leave to File Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint to Join Parties (Jonas, Sandra) |
Filing 19 RESPONSE filed by Axcess Broadcast Services Inc re: #14 MOTION for Leave to File Defendant's First Amended Answer and Original Counterclaim (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s)) (Jonas, Sandra) |
Filing 18 Joint MOTION to Extend Time deadline to mediate and designate experts filed by Axcess Broadcast Services Inc (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Jonas, Sandra) |
Filing 17 RESPONSE filed by Raycom Media Inc re: #15 First MOTION for Leave to File Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint to Join Parties (Marsh, Lindsey) |
|
Filing 15 First MOTION for Leave to File Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint to Join Parties filed by Axcess Broadcast Services Inc (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Exhibit(s) 2, #3 Exhibit(s) 3, #4 Exhibit(s) 4, #5 Exhibit(s) 5) (Jonas, Sandra) |
Filing 14 MOTION for Leave to File Defendant's First Amended Answer and Original Counterclaim filed by Raycom Media Inc with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Raycom's First Amended Answer and Original Counterclaim) (Marsh, Lindsey) |
|
Filing 12 Joint MOTION for Protective Order filed by Axcess Broadcast Services Inc (Jonas, Sandra) |
Filing 11 Joint Report of Agreed Mediator by Raycom Media Inc. (Marsh, Lindsey) Modified text on 4/26/2018 (ykp). |
Filing 10 (Document Restricted) Defendant's Counsel's Contact Information (Sealed pursuant to SO 19-1, statute, or rule) filed by Raycom Media Inc (Marsh, Lindsey) |
Filing 9 (Document Restricted) Attorney Contact Information (Sealed pursuant to order dated 3/23/2018) filed by Axcess Broadcast Services Inc (Jonas, Sandra) |
|
Filing 7 Joint Submission on Discovery Matters Regarding Scheduling Order by Axcess Broadcast Services Inc. (Jonas, Sandra) |
Judge Karen Gren Scholer has recused. Case returned to Judge Ed Kinkeade. (lrl) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Defendant re: #5 Order Reassigning Case filed by Raycom Media Inc (Watler, Paul) |
|
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Axcess Broadcast Services Inc. (Jonas, Sandra) |
|
Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (zkc) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Raycom Media, Inc. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-8985378) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s) B - Supp Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit(s) C - Index of State Court Docs, #4 Exhibit(s) C-1 - State Court Docket, #5 Exhibit(s) C-2 - Plaintiff Original Petition, #6 Exhibit(s) C-3 - Citation & Return of Service, #7 Exhibit(s) C-4 - Defendant Original Answer, #8 Exhibit(s) D - Certificate of Interested Parties, #9 Exhibit(s) E - Plaintiff Articles of Incorporation, #10 Exhibit(s) F - Defendant Delaware Filing) (Watler, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.