Computer Sciences Corporation v. Kemper Corporate Services Inc
Petitioner: Computer Sciences Corporation
Respondent: Kemper Corporate Services Inc
Case Number: 3:2018cv00651
Filed: March 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Karen Gren Scholer
Nature of Suit: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 0010
Jury Demanded By: None
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Computer Sciences Corporation v. Kemper Corporate Services Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Computer Sciences Corporation
Represented By: Stacey P Eilbaum
Represented By: Mark D Harris
Represented By: Christopher D Kratovil
Represented By: Kyle A Owens
Represented By: Peter J W Sherwin
Represented By: Ana Vermal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kemper Corporate Services Inc
Represented By: Christopher Y Lee
Represented By: Christopher K. Meyer
Represented By: Benjamin Robert Nagin
Represented By: Paul E. Veith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?