Castro & Co LLC et al v. Polymath Inc
| Castro & Co LLC and Texas Cryptomarks LLC |
| Polymath Inc |
| 3:2018cv00678 |
| March 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Anderson |
| Sam A Lindsay |
| Trademark |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The court dismisses with prejudice Plaintiffs' claims as set forth in the Amended Complaint 10 ; and granting 21 Motion for Default Judgment with respect to its counterclaims for a declaratory judgment that it is a priority user of the marks at issue and did not commit trademark infringement or engage in unfair competition; and denies Polymaths Motion for Default Judgment 21 with respect to its counterclaims for fraud on the court, trademark infrin gement, and unfair competition. Further, the court dismisses with prejudice Polymath's counterclaims for fraud on the court, trademark infringement, and unfair competition. Accordingly, the court finds Polymath is not entitled to recover damages for any of its counterclaims. Additionally, the court denies Polymath's request for attorney's fees, including fees requested pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a), and denies Polymath's request for injunctive relief. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 9/6/2019) (epm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
