Ricks v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID

Ricks v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID

Petitioner:	Mark Eugene Ricks
Respondent:	Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Case Number:	3:2018cv01048
Filed:	April 25, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office:	Dallas Office
County:	Dallas
Presiding Judge:	Jane J. Boyle
Presiding Judge:	Renee Harris Toliver
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 18, 2018	Filing 13 AMENDED ORDER ACCEPTING 9 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY: The petition for writ of habeas corpus is CONSTRUED as one brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Inso far as Petitioner raises the same claims that he challenged in his first federal habeas action, the petition is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(1), and to the extent Petitioner raises new claims, the petition is DISMISSED WITH OUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction because he has not obtained authorization to file a successive habeas petition from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Additionally, any claim challenging infirmities in the habeas process is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 9/18/2018) (sss)
September 7, 2018	Filing 10 Order Accepting 9 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is CONSTRUED as one brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Insofar as Petitioner raises the same claims that he challenged in his first federal habeas action, the petition is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(1), and to the extent Petitioner raises new claims, the petition is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction because he has not obtained authorization to file a successive habeas petition from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3). Additionally, any claim challenging infirmities in the habeas process is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court DENIES a certificate of appealability. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 9/7/2018) (zkc)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 18, 2018

Filing 13 AMENDED ORDER ACCEPTING 9 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY: The petition for writ of habeas corpus is CONSTRUED as one brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Inso far as Petitioner raises the same claims that he challenged in his first federal habeas action, the petition is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(1), and to the extent Petitioner raises new claims, the petition is DISMISSED WITH OUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction because he has not obtained authorization to file a successive habeas petition from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Additionally, any claim challenging infirmities in the habeas process is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 9/18/2018) (sss)

September 7, 2018

Filing 10 Order Accepting 9 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is CONSTRUED as one brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Insofar as Petitioner raises the same claims that he challenged in his first federal habeas action, the petition is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(1), and to the extent Petitioner raises new claims, the petition is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction because he has not obtained authorization to file a successive habeas petition from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3). Additionally, any claim challenging infirmities in the habeas process is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court DENIES a certificate of appealability. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 9/7/2018) (zkc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ricks v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Mark Eugene Ricks
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?