Reaves v. U. S. Small Business Administration et al
| Sally Reaves |
| U. S. Small Business Administration and Linda McMahon |
| 3:2018cv01230 |
| May 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| Jane J. Boyle |
| Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court affirms the SBAs decision to garnish Reaves's wages. Accordingly, 66 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by US Small Business Administration is granted, and 68 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Sally Reaves is denied. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 10/26/2020) (svc)
|
|
Filing
65
Memorandum Opinion and Order re: 61 MOTION Submit Additional Evidence filed by Sally Reaves is Denied. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 7/14/2020) (svc)
|
|
Filing
53
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 43 Motion to Remand to Agency. This case is REMANDED to the United States Small Business Administration. In the interim, this lawsuit is STAYED until such time as the SBA files a Supplemental Administrative Record with these additional findings. The parties are DIRECTED to file a joint status report within 180 days from the date of this Order if the Supplemental Administrative Record has not been filed within that time. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 8/16/2019) (ykp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
