Esparza v. Partinton et al
| Dominique Esparza |
| Abe Partington, Dustin Koch and City of Waxahachie |
| 3:2018cv01336 |
| May 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| David C Godbey |
| Renee Harris Toliver |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER ACCEPTING 42 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Plaintiff's construed motion to reopen the time to file a notice of appeal under FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(6) is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 10/8/2021) (axm)
|
|
Filing
17
Order Accepting 16 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court prospectively CERTIFIES that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 5/3/2019) (zkc)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER ACCEPTING 9 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. This action is STAYED and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED until the Ellis County misdemeanor charge against Plaintiff for evading arrest and driving while license invalid are finally resolved. The city of Waxahachie is SUBSTITUTED for Waxahachie Police Department. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 7/30/2018) (axm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
