Peucker v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID

Justia Dockets & Filings Fifth Circuit Texas Northern District Peucker v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID

Peucker v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID

Petitioner:	Ryan Andrew Peucker
Respondent:	Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Case Number:	3:2018cv01370
Filed:	May 30, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office:	Dallas Office
County:	Dallas
Presiding Judge:	Sidney A Fitzwater
Presiding Judge:	Renee Harris Toliver
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 22, 2022	Filing 45 Memorandum Opinion and Order denying 44 MOTION for Relief From a Judgement or Order. The court dismisses the petition without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the motion is a disguised successive petition. He may seek leave from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to file a successive application. Alternatively, the court concludes that, even considering the motion on the merits, Peucker has failed to establish that he isentitled to relief under Rule 60(d)(3). The court denies a certificate of appealability. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 6/22/2022) (ykp)
July 16, 2019	Filing 33 Order Accepting 26 Findings and Recommendations and Denying Certificate of Appealability on Case re: 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Ryan Andrew Peucker. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 7/16/2019) (epm)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 22, 2022

Filing 45 Memorandum Opinion and Order denying 44 MOTION for Relief From a Judgement or Order. The court dismisses the petition without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the motion is a disguised successive petition. He may seek leave from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to file a successive application. Alternatively, the court concludes that, even considering the motion on the merits, Peucker has failed to establish that he isentitled to relief under Rule 60(d)(3). The court denies a certificate of appealability. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 6/22/2022) (ykp)

July 16, 2019

Filing 33 Order Accepting 26 Findings and Recommendations and Denying Certificate of Appealability on Case re: 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Ryan Andrew Peucker. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 7/16/2019) (epm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peucker v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Ryan Andrew Peucker
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?