Hunter v. Schopmeyer et al
| Joseph Wayne Hunter |
| Douglas Hugh Schopmeyer, Kathleen Walsh and Katherine A Drew |
| 3:2018cv01589 |
| June 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Anderson |
| Sidney A Fitzwater |
| Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER adopting 28 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation re: the plaintiff's 23 Motion for Leave to File 59(e) and Motion for Reconsideration; denying 23 MOTION for Leave to File 59(e) and Motion For Reconsideration filed by Joseph Wayne Hunter. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 4/21/2020 (Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER OF THE COURT ON RECOMMENDATION REGARDING REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL: The application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED because the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that the appeal is not taken in good faith. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 3/20/2020) (ctf)
|
|
Filing
26
RECOMMENDATION REGARDING REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 3/19/2020) (ndt)
|
|
Filing
21
Order Accepting 20 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 2/25/2020) (ykp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
