Schmidt v. American Security Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Lori Ann Schmidt and Lori Schmidt
Defendant: American Security Insurance Company
Case Number: 3:2018cv01955
Filed: July 27, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: A Joe Fish
Nature of Suit: Contract: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER: Schmidt's #9 motion is GRANTED. This case is REMANDED to the 191st Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas. The clerk shall mail a certified copy of this order to the District Clerk of Dallas County, Texas. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 9/7/2018) (sss)
September 6, 2018 Filing 14 STIPULATION to Remand by American Security Insurance Company. (Gardner, Rebeka)
August 31, 2018 Filing 13 NOTICE of filed by Lori Schmidt (Dick, Eric)
August 31, 2018 Filing 12 NOTICE of Service filed by Lori Schmidt (Dick, Eric)
August 31, 2018 Filing 11 NOTICE of Service of Rule 26 Initial Disclosures filed by American Security Insurance Company (Gardner, Rebeka)
August 24, 2018 Filing 10 Joint STATUS REPORT filed by American Security Insurance Company. (Gardner, Rebeka)
August 16, 2018 Filing 9 MOTION to Remand filed by Lori Schmidt with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) EXHIBIT A, #2 Exhibit(s) EXHIBIT B, #3 Proposed Order ORDER TO REMAND) (Dick, Eric)
August 16, 2018 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Lori Schmidt. (Dick, Eric)
August 7, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Eric B Dick for Naval Patel on behalf of Lori Schmidt. (Dick, Eric)
August 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Within twenty days of this date, the plaintiff shall file the entry of appearance of local counsel satisfying the requirements of Local Rule 83.10(a). Failure to do so will result in dismissal without prejudice of this case without further notice. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 8/2/2018) (sss)
August 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: No later than 20 days after this order is filed, the plaintiff must comply with Rule 3.1(c) or 3.2(e) so that the court can ensure that recusal is not required in this case. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 8/2/2018) (sss)
August 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STATUS REPORT ORDER: Joint Status Report due by 8/24/2018. See order for specifics. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 8/2/2018) (lag/chmb)
July 27, 2018 Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (zkc)
July 27, 2018 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by American Security Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate Assurant, Inc. for American Security Insurance Company. (Gardner, Rebeka)
July 27, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND from 191st District Court of Dallas County, Texas, case number DC-17-07144 filed by American Security Insurance Company. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-9346577) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 13, #14 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #15 Cover Sheet Supplement Supplemental Civil Cover) (Gardner, Rebeka)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schmidt v. American Security Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lori Ann Schmidt
Represented By: Eric B Dick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lori Schmidt
Represented By: Eric B Dick
Represented By: Naval Hemendra Patel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Security Insurance Company
Represented By: Bradley J Aiken
Represented By: Rebeka Briana Gardner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?