Hart et al v. Tufenkian Artisan Carpets
Linda W. Hart, Milledge A Hart, III and Linda W Hart |
Tufenkian Carpets Dallas, LLC and Tufenkian Artisan Carpets |
3:2018cv02178 |
August 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Dallas Office |
Dallas |
A Joe Fish |
Contract: Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 DEFENDANT'S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS #5 PARTIAL 12(b)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Tufenkian Artisan (Bailey, Blake) Modified title and document linkage on 10/5/2018 (ctf). |
Filing 15 ANSWER to #14 Amended Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Tufenkian Artisan Carpets. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A) (Bailey, Blake) |
Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT (Second) against All Defendants filed by Milledge A Hart, III, Linda W Hart. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Furness, Aimee) |
Filing 13 ORDER: Plaintiffs' unopposed motion for leave to file amended complaint (docket entry #10 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall electronically file their amended complaint no later than 9/21/2018. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 9/18/2018) (sss) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to Counterclaim filed by Linda W Hart. Related document: #5 Answer to Complaint,,, Counterclaim,, (Furness, Aimee) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Linda W Hart, Milledge A Hart, III re: 8 MOTION to Dismiss (Furness, Aimee) |
Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint filed by Linda W Hart, Milledge A Hart, III (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Proposed Order) (Furness, Aimee) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Linda W Hart, Milledge A Hart, III. (Furness, Aimee) |
Filing 8 (See docket entry #5 for image.) MOTION to Dismiss filed by Tufenkian Artisan Carpets. (epm) |
Filing 7 ORDER: On 8/17/2018, the defendant removed this civil action to this court. Accordingly, no later than 20 days after this order is filed, the plaintiffs must comply with Rule 3.1(c) or 3.2(e) so that the court can ensure that recusal is not required in this case. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 8/24/2018) (ykp) |
Filing 6 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Tufenkian Artisan Carpets re #5 Answer to Complaint,,, Counterclaim,, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Proposed Order) (Bailey, Blake) |
Filing 5 Motion to Dismiss and ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Tufenkian Artisan Carpets. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge., COUNTERCLAIM against All Plaintiffs filed by Tufenkian Artisan Carpets (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A) (Bailey, Blake) |
Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (sss) |
Filing 3 Supplemental Document (Civil & Supplemental Cover Sheets) by Tufenkian Carpets Dallas, LLC as to #1 Notice of Removal. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Bailey, Blake) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Tufenkian Carpets Dallas, LLC. (Bailey, Blake) (Main Document 2 replaced to flatten PDF on 8/20/2018) (sss). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 95th District, Dallas County, case number DC-18-07159 filed by Tufenkian Carpets Dallas, LLC. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-9393554) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - Index of Documents, #2 Exhibit(s) B - State Court Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit(s) C - Original Petition, #4 Exhibit(s) D - State Civil Case Info Sheet, #5 Exhibit(s) E - Citation, #6 Exhibit(s) F - First Amended Petition, #7 Exhibit(s) G - Citation, #8 Exhibit(s) H - Service on Defendant, #9 Exhibit(s) I - Defendant's Cert of Formation) (Bailey, Blake) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.