Smith et al v. Skopos Financial, LLC et al
| Kelvin Smith and Angelia Smith |
| Mark Gallas, Skopos Financial, LLC, Jerry Kroshus, Dan Porter, Dallas County Recovery, LLC, Dallas County Recovery LLC and Skopos Financial LLC |
| 3:2018cv02248 |
| August 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| David L Horan |
| Sam A Lindsay |
| Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Wed Sep 19 10:43:01 CDT 2018 (crt) |
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER OF REFERENCE: This case is hereby referred to United States Magistrate Judge David L. Horan for pretrial management. All nondispositive motions, pending or prospective, are referred to the magistrate judge for determination. All dispositive motions, pending or prospective, are referred to the magistrate judge for findings of fact and recommendations. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 9/18/2018) (sss)
|
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Mark Gallas, Jerry Kroshus, Dan Porter, Skopos Financial LLC. (Biles, C) |
| Filing 5 Appendix in Support filed by Mark Gallas, Jerry Kroshus, Dan Porter, Skopos Financial LLC re #4 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2), 12(b)(5), and 12(b)(6), and Brief in Support (Biles, C) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2), 12(b)(5), and 12(b)(6), and Brief in Support filed by Mark Gallas, Jerry Kroshus, Dan Porter, Skopos Financial LLC with Brief/Memorandum in Support. Attorney C Dunham Biles added to party Mark Gallas(pty:dft), Attorney C Dunham Biles added to party Jerry Kroshus(pty:dft), Attorney C Dunham Biles added to party Dan Porter(pty:dft) (Biles, C) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 3. Mon Aug 27 09:24:36 CDT 2018 (crt) |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (ykp) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Case received over counter/electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ykp) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from County Court at Law No. 3, Dallas County, case number CC-18-03935-C filed by Skopos Financial, LLC. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-9408722) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Cover Sheet, #3 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Wysocki, Ashley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
