Coleman v. Dennis
Plaintiff: Keith Coleman
Defendant: Kevin Dennis and Kevin E Dennis
Case Number: 3:2018cv02264
Filed: August 27, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Sam A Lindsay
Referring Judge: Rebecca Rutherford
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2018 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Wed Aug 29 09:36:20 CDT 2018 (crt)
August 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this action and sua sponte remands it to the Dallas County Justice of the Peace Court, Precinct 4, Place 1, from which it was removed. The court directs the clerk of court to effect this remand in accordance with the usual procedure. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 8/28/2018) (aaa)
August 27, 2018 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Keith Coleman. (rekc)
August 27, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Justice of the Peace, Precinct 4, Place 1, case number JE18-01968G filed by Keith Coleman. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (rekc)
August 27, 2018 Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (rekc)
August 27, 2018 Filing 2 ***DISREGARD - ENTERED IN ERROR *** Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (rekc) Modified on 8/27/2018 (rekc).
August 27, 2018 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. SCREEN case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (rekc)
August 27, 2018 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 3. Mon Aug 27 15:44:44 CDT 2018 (crt)
August 27, 2018 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Keith Coleman. [Please see #4 for image.] (rekc) Modified on 8/27/2018 (rekc).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coleman v. Dennis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kevin Dennis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kevin E Dennis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keith Coleman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?