Ballard v. Social Security Administration
| Betty Ann Ballard |
| Social Security Administration |
| Social Security Administration - Interested Party |
| 3:2018cv02287 |
| August 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| David L Horan |
| Sam A Lindsay |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW (405(g)) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 402 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Business Reply Card signed by USMS; re #3 Complaint, #9 Order, #10 Summons Issued, #7 Judge's Questionnaire. Signed on 10/1/2018. (axm) |
| Filing 10 Summons issued as to Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (ndt) (Main Document 10 replaced to add address on 10/1/2018) (sss). |
Filing 9
ORDER REQUIRING FURTHER ACTION BY THE CLERK AND SERVICE BY THE MARSHAL: Based on Plaintiff's verified responses to the Court's screening questionnaire,it appears that she is seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. See Dkt. No. [8.] While Plaintiff's action may be time- barred under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), that affirmative defense should be raised by the Commissioner. The Clerk of the Court shall therefore take the following actions: A true copy of this Order shall be transmitted to Plaintiff. The Clerk of the Court shall issue summons and the United States Marshal shall serve process on the following Defendant and her attorneys. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 9/28/2018) (ndt)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9. Fri Sep 28 16:04:13 CDT 2018 (crt) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE filed by Betty Ann Ballard re: #7 Judge's Questionnaire. (rekc) |
|
Filing 7
MAGISTRATE Judge's Questionnaire sent to Plaintiff. Responses due by 10/1/2018. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 8/30/2018) (epm)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER denying #4 Motion to Appoint Counsel; granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 8/30/2018) (epm)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6,7. Thu Aug 30 12:48:30 CDT 2018 (crt) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Betty Ann Ballard. (sss) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for the Appointment of Counsel filed by Betty Ann Ballard. (sss) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration filed by Betty Ann Ballard. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (sss) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (sss) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (sss) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Wed Aug 29 13:56:38 CDT 2018 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
