Baksinski v. Luminant Energy Company LLC
| James Baksinski |
| Luminant Energy Company LLC |
| 3:2018cv02354 |
| September 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam R Cummings |
| Labor: Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Order: The Court, having considered Plaintiffs Notice of Dismissal, filed September 7, 2018, is of the opinion that Plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(l)(A)(i). It is therefore ORDERED that the above-styled and -numbered civil action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as of September 7, 2018. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 9/12/2018) (ndt)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Rule 41 Dismissal without Prejudice filed by James Baksinski (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Dunlap, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by James Baksinski. (Dunlap, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Luminant Energy Company LLC. (epm) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (epm) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to issue Summons in a Civil Action filed by James Baksinski. (Dunlap, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Luminant Energy Company, LLC filed by James Baksinski. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-9429902) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Cover Sheet) (Dunlap, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Baksinski v. Luminant Energy Company LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Luminant Energy Company LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James Baksinski | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Dunlap |
| Represented By: | Michael A Josephson |
| Represented By: | Richard J Burch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
