CNR Operations LLC et al v. HBC Whitewater LLC et al
| CNR Operations LLC, CESWD 1, LLC and CESWD 1 LLC |
| Peter Benz, Scott Stabler, HBC Water Resources, LP, Joe Colonnetta, Peter Brodsky, Kent McNellie, Jerry Banta, HBC Whitewater LLC, Ben Doud, HBC Water Resources LP and Ben R Doud |
| 3:2018cv02432 |
| September 12, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam R Cummings |
| Contract: Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1452 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 RESPONSE filed by CESWD 1 LLC, CNR Operations LLC re: #3 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, For a More Definite Statement or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer, #9 MOTION to Dismiss (Seay, Ryan) |
| Filing 20 Supplemental Document by Peter Brodsky, Joe Colonnetta, HBC Whitewater LLC, Kent McNellie as to #18 Response/Objection . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s)) (Malouf, Stephen) |
| Filing 19 Appendix in Support filed by Peter Brodsky, Joe Colonnetta, HBC Whitewater LLC, Kent McNellie re #18 Response/Objection (Malouf, Stephen) |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE filed by Peter Brodsky, Joe Colonnetta, HBC Whitewater LLC, Kent McNellie re: #12 MOTION to Remand (Malouf, Stephen) |
Filing 17
SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 2/15/2019. Discovery due by 3/16/2020. Joinder of Parties due by 2/15/2019. Motions due by 10/15/2019. Trial set for 4/6/2020 09:00 AM before Senior Judge Sam R Cummings. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 10/24/2018) (axm)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting in part and denying in part #15 Motion to Stay Proceeding Pending Ruling on Plaintiffs' Motion to Abstain and Remand or, in the Alternative, Motion to Enlarge Time to Respond to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. Accordingly, to the extent Plaintiffs request that the Court stay the above-styled and numbered civil action, that request is DENIED. Plaintiffs' request seeking an enlargement of time to respond to Defendants' Motions should be GRANTED. Responses due by 11/9/2018. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 10/9/2018) (axm)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to #3 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, For a More Definite Statement or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer, #9 MOTION to Dismiss (), Emergency MOTION to Stay re #12 MOTION to Remand filed by CESWD 1 LLC, CNR Operations LLC with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Norman, Brian) |
| Filing 14 Appendix in Support filed by CESWD 1 LLC, CNR Operations LLC re #13 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion, #12 MOTION to Remand (Norman, Brian) |
| Filing 13 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by CESWD 1 LLC, CNR Operations LLC re #12 MOTION to Remand (Norman, Brian) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Remand filed by CESWD 1 LLC, CNR Operations LLC (Norman, Brian) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Peter Brodsky, Joe Colonnetta, HBC Whitewater LLC, Kent McNellie. (Malouf, Stephen) |
| Filing 10 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Ben R Doud re #9 MOTION to Dismiss (Madrid, Jay) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Ben R Doud with Brief/Memorandum in Support. Attorney Jay J Madrid added to party Ben R Doud(pty:dft) (Madrid, Jay) |
| Filing 8 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by CESWD 1 LLC, CNR Operations LLC. (Norman, Brian) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Rule 9027(e) Statement filed by CESWD 1 LLC, CNR Operations LLC (Norman, Brian) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Conference re #3 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, For a More Definite Statement or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer by Stephen F Malouf on behalf of Peter Brodsky, Joe Colonnetta, HBC Whitewater LLC, Kent McNellie (Malouf, Stephen) |
| Filing 5 Appendix in Support filed by Peter Brodsky, Joe Colonnetta, HBC Whitewater LLC, Kent McNellie re #4 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion, (Malouf, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Peter Brodsky, Joe Colonnetta, HBC Whitewater LLC, Kent McNellie re #3 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, For a More Definite Statement or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer (Malouf, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, For a More Definite Statement or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer filed by Peter Brodsky, Joe Colonnetta, HBC Whitewater LLC, Kent McNellie (Malouf, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mcrd/ala) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 101st District Court, Dallas County, case number DC-18-09957 filed by Peter Brodsky, Joe Colonnetta, Kent McNellie, HBC Whitewater LLC. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-9447659) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Malouf, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
