Nelson v. Medthodist Dallas Medical Center
Plaintiff: Benita Nelson
Defendant: Medthodist Dallas Medical Center
Case Number: 3:2018cv02694
Filed: October 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Jane J Boyle
Referring Judge: Rebecca Rutherford
Nature of Suit: Torts/Pers Inj: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2018 Filing 8 RESPONSE filed by Benita Nelson re: #6 Judge's Questionnaire. (axm)
October 18, 2018 Filing 7 MOTION for Court Date filed by Benita Nelson. (epm)
October 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Judge's Questionnaire sent to Benita Nelson. Deadline to respond to the questionnaire is 30 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 10/15/2018) (ndt)
October 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Clerk of the Court SHALL NOT ISSUE SUMMONS or take any further action pending judicial screening. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 10/15/2018) (ndt)
October 15, 2018 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Mon Oct 15 14:20:56 CDT 2018 (crt)
October 15, 2018 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Mon Oct 15 14:22:31 CDT 2018 (crt)
October 11, 2018 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Thu Oct 11 09:43:18 CDT 2018 (crt)
October 10, 2018 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Benita Nelson. (mcrd/ala)
October 10, 2018 Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Medthodist Dallas Medical Center filed by Benita Nelson. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mcrd/ala)
October 10, 2018 Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (mcrd/ala)
October 10, 2018 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. SCREEN case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mcrd/ala)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nelson v. Medthodist Dallas Medical Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Benita Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Medthodist Dallas Medical Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?