Hickson v. Carrollton Police Department
| Natalie Hickson, Estate of Malcom Loren Hickson, Bryson O Hickson and Lapresha Stanley |
| Carrollton Police Department, Caleb West and City of Carrollton, Texas |
| 3:2018cv02747 |
| October 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Caleb West ; served on 12/7/2018. (Le Brocq, Stephen) |
| Filing 15 Summons Issued as to City of Carrollton, Texas, Caleb West. (aaa) |
Filing 14
ORDER: The plaintiffs have now retained counsel, who has filed an amended complaint on their behalf that has dropped the non-jural entity. Based on the filing of the amended complaint that addresses the issues raised in the #8 Motion to Dismiss, it is DEEMED MOOT. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 11/26/2018) (ykp)
|
| Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Bryson O Hickson, Estate of Malcom Loren Hickson, Natalie Hickson, Lapresha Stanley. (One or more defendant(s) is no longer named.) Clerk to issue summons(es). Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Le Brocq, Stephen) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER denying #11 Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint as unnecessary and without prejudice to either the filing of an amended complaint within the 21-day time limit in Rule 15(a)(1) or the filing of a motion that complies with the Local Civil Rules. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 11/12/2018) (Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint filed by Estate of Malcom Loren Hickson, Bryson O Hickson, Natalie Hickson, Lapresha Stanley (Le Brocq, Stephen) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Stephen Le Brocq on behalf of Natalie Hickson, Estate of Malcom Loren Hickson, Lapresha Stanley, Bryson O Hickson. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.). Party Lapresha Roquel Stanleyindividually, as representative of the Estate of Malcom Loren Hickson, and as Next of Friend of B.O.H., a minor child added. (Le Brocq, Stephen) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER re: #8 Defendant Carrollton Police Department's Rule 12 (b)(6) Motion to Dismiss and Brief. Respondent may file a response by 11/26/2018. Movant may file a reply by 12/10/2018. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 11/6/2018) (mcrd)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9. Tue Nov 6 11:15:35 CST 2018 (crt) |
| Filing 8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Carrollton Police Department with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Stephen D Henninger added to party Carrollton Police Department(pty:dft) (Henninger, Stephen) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Carrollton Police Department; served on 10/17/2018. (ykp) |
|
Filing 6
Order and Notice of Deficiency: Natalie Hickson must address the following deficiency: Plaintiff may not represent it or its beneficiaries pro se. If she wishes to proceed with this case on behalf of the estate and its beneficiaries,Plaintiff must retain legal counsel to represent them. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 21 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 10/19/2018) (epm)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Fri Oct 19 10:05:54 CDT 2018 (crt) |
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER OF REFERENCE: This case is hereby referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge Irma Ramirez for pretrial management. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 10/18/2018) (svc)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Thu Oct 18 11:15:29 CDT 2018 (crt) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Carrollton Police Department. (rekc) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Carrolton Police Department filed by Natalie Hickson. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number DS111501) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (rekc) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Case received over counter/electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (rekc) |
| Filing 1 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (rekc) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Wed Oct 17 16:33:45 CDT 2018 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
