Jackson v. XPO Logistics Freight Inc et al
| Janice Jackson |
| XPO Logistics Freight Inc, John Doe and XPO CNW Inc |
| 3:2018cv02766 |
| October 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| A Joe Fish |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Filing Record Affidavits and Certified Copies filed by Janice Jackson (Futrell, J) |
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER: Trial set for four-week docket beginning 11/4/2019 before Senior Judge A. Joe Fish. Joinder of Parties due by 3/4/2019. Amended Pleadings due by 3/4/2019. Motions due by 7/26/2019. Discovery due by 9/30/2019. Pretrial Order due by 10/25/2019. Pretrial Materials due by 10/25/2019. Pretrial Conference set for 11/1/2019 10:00 AM before Senior Judge A. Joe Fish. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 12/3/2018) (rekc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/4/2018: #1 Consent Form) (rekc).
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Defendants XPO Logistics and XPO CNW's Initial Disclosures filed by XPO CNW Inc, XPO Logistics Freight Inc (Scudder, Mark) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Submission of Rule 26 Initial Disclosure filed by Janice Jackson (Futrell, J) |
| Filing 7 Joint STATUS REPORT filed by Janice Jackson, XPO Logistics Freight Inc, XPO CNW Inc. (Futrell, J) Modified to reflect joint filers on 11/16/2018 (mcrd/ala). |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Janice Jackson. (Futrell, J) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: No later than 20 days after this order is filed, the plaintiff must comply with Rule 3.1(c) or 3.2(e) so that the court can ensure that recusal is not required in this case. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 10/25/2018) (zkc)
|
|
Filing 4
STATUS REPORT ORDER: Joint Status Report due by 11/16/2018. No order for specifics. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 10/25/2018) (lag/chmb)
|
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (epm) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by John Doe, XPO CNW, Inc., XPO Logistics Freight, Inc.. (Costello, Amanda) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND from 14th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, case number DC-18-12517 filed by XPO Logistics Freight, Inc., XPO CNW, Inc. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-9523694) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Cover Sheet Supplement Supplemental Cover Sheet) (Scudder, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
