Reich v. Berryhill et al
Plaintiff: M Elizabeth Reich
Defendant: Nancy A Berryhill
Interested Party: Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Case Number: 3:2018cv02946
Filed: November 5, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Jane J Boyle
Referring Judge: Irma Carrillo Ramirez
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order Granting Government's Omnibus Motion for Stay of Cases in Light of Lapse of Appropriations (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 12/28/2018) (Attachments: #1 Government's Omnibus Motion for Stay) (lrl)
December 27, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Brian Walters Stoltz-DOJ on behalf of Nancy A Berryhill, Social Security Administration - Interested Party. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Stoltz-DOJ, Brian)
November 9, 2018 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Nancy A Berryhill; served on 11/8/2018. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit(s) Delivery confirmation of Summons to Attorney General, #2 Affidavit(s) Delivery confirmation of Summons to US Attorney for the Northern District of Texas) (Reich, Santiago)
November 5, 2018 Filing 4 Summons issued as to Nancy A Berryhill, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (aaa)
November 5, 2018 Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (aaa)
November 5, 2018 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by M Elizabeth Reich. (aaa)
November 5, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Nancy A Berryhill filed by M Elizabeth Reich. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number DS0111917) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (aaa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reich v. Berryhill et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: M Elizabeth Reich
Represented By: Santiago Zorzopulos Reich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A Berryhill
Represented By: Brian Walters Stoltz-DOJ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?