Davis v. Rayburn CC et al
| Travis Davis |
| Dallas County Jail, Middleton Unit, Washington Parish Jail, Latoya Eaton, Bogalusa, LA, Rayburn CC, New Orleans, LA, St. Tammy Parish Jail, City of Dallas, TX and Turning Ponit |
| 3:2018cv03131 |
| November 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| Rebecca Rutherford |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Public correspondence received from Travis Davis. (zkc) |
Filing 9
SECOND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER: Travis Davis must address the following deficiency: The $400 fee has not been paid nor has a proper request to proceed in forma pauperis been submitted. Civil rights pleadings are not filed on the appropriate form. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that the complaint be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Procedure 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 30 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 1/17/2019) (Attachments: #1 IFP Form, #2 Complaint Form) (zkc)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No: 9. Thu Jan 17 13:30:51 CST 2019 (crt) |
| Filing 8 Public correspondence filed by Travis Davis. (ndt) |
| Filing 7 Public correspondence filed received from Travis Davis. (ndt) |
| Filing 6 Public correspondence received from Travis Davis. (zkc) |
| Filing 5 Public correspondence received from Travis Davis. (zkc) |
|
Filing 4
Order and Notice of Deficiency: Travis Davis must address the following deficiency: The $400 fee has not been paid nor has a proper request to proceed in forma pauperis been submitted. Civil rights pleadings are not filed on the appropriate form. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 30 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 12/3/2018) (Attachments: #1 IFP Form, #2 Complaint Form) (axm)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Mon Dec 3 15:34:04 CST 2018 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Wed Nov 28 16:20:57 CST 2018 (crt) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Bogalusa, LA, City of Dallas, TX, Dallas County Jail, Latoya Eaton, Middleton Unit, New Orleans, LA, Rayburn CC, St. Tammy Parish Jail, Turning Ponit, Washington Parish Jail filed by Travis Davis. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (rekc) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (rekc) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. SCREEN case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (rekc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
