Roor International BV et al v. E-Z-Way Wholesale LLC et al
| Sream Inc and Roor International BV |
| E-Z-Way Wholesale LLC, Muhammad Abbas Khan and Raja Khan |
| 3:2018cv03267 |
| December 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| David C Godbey |
| Property Rights: Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #9 Motion to waive or delay. The Local Counsel Requirement is waived until one week after the defendant has filed a notice of appearance or response to plaintiffs' complaint. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 1/4/2019) (ewd)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Waive or Delay Local Counsel Requirement re 3 Order, MOTION to Extend Time filed by Roor International BV, Sream Inc with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Jacoby, Andrew) |
|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge David C Godbey for all further proceedings. Judge Ed Kinkeade no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 12/26/2018) (chmb) Modified to add document number on 12/26/2018 (rekc).
|
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Roor International BV, Sream Inc. (Jacoby, Andrew) |
| Filing 6 Report to Patent/Trademark Office of Initiating Document. Form AO 120 e-mailed to notice_of_suit@uspto.gov. (mla) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to E-Z-Way Wholesale LLC, Muhammad Abbas Khan, Raja Khan. (mla) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mla) |
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC ORDER: Local Rule 83.10(a) requires the appearance of local counsel where counsel of record for a party does not reside in this district. Accordingly, within twenty days of this date, plaintiffs RooR International BV, and Stream, Inc., shall file the entry of appearance of local counsel satisfying the requirements of Local Rule 83.10(a). Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this case without prejudice and without further notice. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 12/13/2018) (chmb)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Sream Inc, Roor International BV. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-9642080) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s) A, #3 Exhibit(s) B, #4 Exhibit(s) C, #5 Exhibit(s) D, #6 Exhibit(s) E) (Jacoby, Andrew) Modified filing fee and receipt information on 12/13/2018 (mla). |
| Filing 1 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Roor International BV, Sream Inc. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s), #2 Additional Page(s)) (Jacoby, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
