Phillips v. Texas Department of Family Protective Services et al
| Deloris Phillips |
| United States Department of Homeland Security and Texas Department of Family Protective Services |
| 3:2018cv03298 |
| December 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam R Cummings |
| Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| Other Statutes: Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. § 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #16 Order Accepting/Adopting Findings and Recommendations, to the Fifth Circuit by Deloris Phillips. T.O. form to appellant electronically at #Transcript Order Form or US Mail as appropriate. Copy of NOA to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed. IMPORTANT ACTION REQUIRED: Provide an electronic copy of any exhibit you offered during a hearing or trial that was admitted into evidence to the clerk of the district court within 14 days of the date of this notice. Copies must be transmitted as PDF attachments through ECF by all ECF Users or delivered to the clerk on a CD by all non-ECF Users. See detailed instructions #here. (Exception: This requirement does not apply to a pro se prisoner litigant.) Please note that if original exhibits are in your possession, you must maintain them through final disposition of the case. (zkc) |
| USCA Case Number 19-10062 in USCA5 for #13 Notice of Appeal, filed by Deloris Phillips. (epm) |
Filing 16
ORDER OF THE COURT ON #15 RECOMMENDATION REGARDING REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL. The court certifies that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith denying #14 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. This Court finds that the appeal presents no legal points of arguable merit and is therefore frivolous. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 1/23/2019) (ykp)
|
|
Filing 15
Recommendation Regarding Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis on Appeal: The request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal should be DENIED because the Court should certify pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3) and 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that the appeal is not taken in good faith. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 1/18/2019) (mcrd)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on appeal re #13 Notice of Appeal filed by Deloris Phillips (ykp) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #11 Order Accepting/Adopting Findings and Recommendations, #12 Judgment to the Fifth Circuit by Deloris Phillips. T.O. form to appellant electronically at #Transcript Order Form or US Mail as appropriate. Copy of NOA to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed. IMPORTANT ACTION REQUIRED: Provide an electronic copy of any exhibit you offered during a hearing or trial that was admitted into evidence to the clerk of the district court within 14 days of the date of this notice. Copies must be transmitted as PDF attachments through ECF by all ECF Users or delivered to the clerk on a CD by all non-ECF Users. See detailed instructions #here. (Exception: This requirement does not apply to a pro se prisoner litigant.) Please note that if original exhibits are in your possession, you must maintain them through final disposition of the case. (rekc) |
|
Filing 12
JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the above-styled and-numbered civil action be dismissed without prejudice (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 1/14/2019) (rekc)
|
|
Filing 11
Order Adopting #8 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation. Plaintiff's objections are overruled. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 1/14/2019) (rekc)
|
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deloris Phillips. (rekc) |
| Filing 9 OBJECTION to #8 Findings and Recommendations PETITIONER'S OBJECTION, MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, MOTION TO REOPEN, AND MOTION FOR HEARING TO MAKE OFFER OF PROOF TO PRESENT EVIDENCE AND TO PRESERVE ERROR.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) PETITIONER'S SUPPORT FOR MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE NOTICE OF ACCELERATED APPEAL (ORIGINALLY FILED 3:18-CV-1830), #2 Exhibit(s) PETITIONER'S COPY OF SUBPOENAS FOR MAYOR RAWLINGS AND DIRECT ALL DIRECT PARTIES WHO KNOW OF PREMEDITATED GREEN OAKS AND FABRICATED POLICE REPORT (ORIGINALLY FILED IN DF-18-00541-303RD, #3 Exhibit(s) PETITIONER'S NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFER OF PROOF ORIGINALLY FILED IN DF-18-00541), #4 Exhibit(s) PETITIONER'S LETTER BRIEF REGARDING JURISDICTION WITH CITY OF DALLAS AND DPD (ORIGINALLY FILED IN 05-18-00317-CV), #5 Exhibit(s) PETITIONER'S WRIT OF MANDAMUS FOR RECONSIDERATION/REHEARING FOR DENIED WRIT OF MANDAMUS ENBANC (ORIGINALLY FILED 05-18-00543-CV), #6 Exhibit(s) PETITIONER'S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD ON APPEAL WITH DC-14-06905 (ORIGINALLY FILED IN 05-18-00659-CV), #7 Exhibit(s) NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFER OF PROOF, SUPPORT AND EVIDENCE FOR FINAL TRIAL WITH ATTACHED OFFER OF PROOF AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS (ORIGINALLY FILED IN DF-18-00541-3O03RD), #8 Exhibit(s) PETITIONER' SFIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTION) (Phillips, Deloris) |
|
Filing 8
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION on Motion re: #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #6 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, #2 Motion for Leave to File. The motion for leave to proceed with this action, application to proceed without paying fees or costs, and any remaining motions should be DENIED. The Court should order that any pending and future motions filed in this action shall be docketed for administrative purposes only and terminated, and that no action will be taken on those filings while this action remains closed pursuant to the sanctions order. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 12/28/2018) (epm)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Related Case AND MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE/TRANSFER CASES re: #1 Judge Cummings (Dallas), #6 MOTION for Summons of Original Complaint filed by Deloris Phillips (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) U.S. AMERICA, ET AL VS. NORTHROP MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (89-C-6111) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO AMEND COMPLAINT (2 PGS.), #2 Exhibit(s) JACK PHILLIP (MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP) VS. COLORADO OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS ET AL (3:18-CV-O2074-WYD-STV) 59 PGS., #3 Exhibit(s) COLORADO OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS MOTION TO DISMISS JACK PHILLIPS VERIFIED COMPLAINT (29 PGS.), #4 Exhibit(s) ROY & KAYLA MOORE CIVIL COMPLAINT ALLEGING CONSPIRACY TO DERAIL POLITICAL CAREER (14 PGS.), #5 Exhibit(s) PETITIONER'S FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTION (10 PGS.)) (Phillips, Deloris) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Summons of Original Complaint filed by Deloris Phillips. (Phillips, Deloris) Modified to add motion event on 12/26/2018 (zkc). |
| Filing 5 Deputy Clerk Response re #4 Public Correspondence Requesting ECF Notification. (axm) |
| Filing 4 Public Correspondence Requesting ECF Notification filed by Deloris Phillips (Phillips, Deloris) Modified docket text on 12/18/2018 (ajb). Modified event on 12/19/2018 (axm). |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Deloris Phillips (ajb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to File Petitioner's Complaint for Injunctive Relief filed by Deloris Phillips (ajb) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.). (ajb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
