Nabaya v. Bureau of Prisons et al
Shapat Nabaya |
Bureau of Prisons, John Doe, NFN Broadnak, John Doe Perez and Jane Doe Braham |
3:2019cv00215 |
January 28, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Sam A Lindsay |
Renee Harris Toliver |
Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No: 16. Thu Mar 28 10:06:35 CDT 2019 (crt) |
Filing 16 Judge's Questionnaire sent to Shapat Nabaya. Responses due by 4/24/2019. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 3/27/2019) (zkc) |
Filing 15 ORDER GRANTING Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and assessing a partial filing fee in the amount of $44.00 with a balance of $306.00 remaining. Clerk to mail this order to the attention of the Inmate Trust Fund Department at the facility where the inmate resides. No process will issue pending completion of screening. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 3/21/2019) (chmb) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:15. Thu Mar 21 10:44:25 CDT 2019 (crt) |
Filing 14 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Shapat Nabaya (ykp) |
Filing 13 Certificate of Trust Account by Shapat Nabaya TDCJ #90804083. (aaa) |
Filing 12 ELECTRONIC ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY. Plaintiff must address the following deficiency: The Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis does not include a signed Certificate of Inmate Trust Account and, thus, does not provide enough information for the Court to determine if in forma pauperis status is appropriate. Doc. #8 . Therefore, Plaintiff is ORDERED to submit a signed Certificate of Inmate Trust Account by 4/2/2019. See Complaint form at page 2, 3 for filing fee information under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 3/4/2019) (chmb) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:12. IFP Form Mon Mar 4 14:51:10 CST 2019 (crt) |
Filing 11 Judicial Notice re: #7 Amended Complaint filed by Shapat Nabaya (ykp) |
Filing 10 Judicial Notice re: #8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Shapat Nabaya (ykp) Modified linkage on 2/26/2019 (zkc). |
Filing 9 Civil Claim for Mandatory Injunctive Relief Pursuant to Civil Rule 8(a)(1)(2)(3). Jurisdiction of the Court filed by Shapat Nabaya (ykp) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Shapat Nabaya (ykp) |
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Jane Doe Braham, Bureau of Prisons, John Doe Perez filed by Shapat Nabaya. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (ykp) Modified on 2/26/2019 (zkc). |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC Order and Notice of Deficiency: Plaintiff Shapat Nabaya must address the following deficiency: Plaintiff must address the following deficiency: The complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis were not filed on the appropriate form. Therefore, by 2/27/2019, Plaintiff is ORDERED (1) to submit his civil rights complaint on the enclosed form, and (2) to pay the $400.00 filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis on the enclosed form with the required certificate of inmate trust account. See Complaint form at page 2, paragraph 3 for filing fee information under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(b).The Clerk of the Court is directed to provide to Plaintiff, with service of this Order, a prisoner civil rights complaint form and a prisoner form motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 1/29/2019) (chmb) |
Filing 5 JUDICIAL NOTICE of filed by Shapat Nabaya. (ndt) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Shapat Nabaya. (ndt) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against NFN Broadnak, Bureau of Prisons, John Doe filed by Shapat Nabaya. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (ndt) |
Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (ndt) |
Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. SCREEN case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ndt) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Mon Jan 28 16:32:16 CST 2019 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.