Claiborne v. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
Plaintiff: Shanta Y Claiborne
Defendant: Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
Case Number: 3:2019cv00250
Filed: January 31, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Barbara MG Lynn
Referring Judge: Renee Harris Toliver
Nature of Suit: Torts/Pers Inj: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 31, 2019 Filing 5 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (ykp)
January 31, 2019 Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver. (ykp)
January 31, 2019 Filing 3 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Elliott, Jason)
January 31, 2019 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. (Elliott, Jason)
January 31, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND from District Court Dallas County, Texas 116th Judicial District, case number DC-19-00224 filed by Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-9748394) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement, #3 Index of State Court Documents, #4 Exhibit(s) 1, #5 Exhibit(s) 2, #6 Exhibit(s) 3, #7 Exhibit(s) 4, #8 Exhibit(s) 5, #9 Exhibit(s) 6) (Elliott, Jason)
January 31, 2019 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4,5. Thu Jan 31 17:17:19 CST 2019 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Claiborne v. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
Represented By: Ann Marie Painter
Represented By: Michael Alexander Pratt
Represented By: Jason R Elliott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shanta Y Claiborne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?