Claiborne v. United States
| Shanta Y Claiborne |
| United States |
| 3:2019cv00391 |
| February 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam R Cummings |
| David L Horan |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER: Shanta Y Claiborne must address the following deficiency: Claiborne has not plausibly alleged how the sole named defendant is subject to suit. Her complaint does not comply with the applicable pleading standards. Failure to follow this instruction will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and obey orders of the Court. pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 3/22/2019. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 2/20/2019) (Attachments: #1 Complaint Form) (zkc)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 2/20/2019) (zkc)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No: 6, 7. Wed Feb 20 10:45:56 CST 2019 (crt) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Shanta Y Claiborne. (zkc) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Shanta Y Claiborne. (zkc) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against United States filed by Shanta Y Claiborne. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (zkc) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (zkc) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (zkc) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No: 1, 2. Fri Feb 15 16:10:42 CST 2019 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Claiborne v. United States | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shanta Y Claiborne | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
