Rodarte v. Powell et al
| Maria Teresa Rodarte |
| MK Leasing LLC, Stans Inc and Lloyd Michael Powell |
| 3:2019cv00428 |
| February 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| David C Godbey |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 First MOTION for Leave to File Plaintiff's First Amended Petition filed by Maria Teresa Rodarte with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Amendment Plaintiff's First Amended Petition) (Smith, Cory) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Nonsuit of MK Leasing, LLC. without Prejudice filed by Maria Teresa Rodarte (Smith, Cory) |
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #5 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Cory Smith. If not already done, Applicant must register as an ECF User within 14 days (LR 5.1(f)). (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 3/28/2019) (chmb)
|
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Maria Teresa Rodarte. (Smith, Cory) |
| Filing 5 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Filing fee $25; Receipt number 0539-9877122) filed by Maria Teresa Rodarte (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) Good Standing Letter from State Bar) (Smith, Cory) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Stans Inc. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Jury Demand) (Sargent, David) |
| CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT, see Document #1 for image, by Stans Inc. (mla) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (svc) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing of Removal re: #1 Notice of Removal filed by Stans Inc. (Sargent, David) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND from 44th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, TX, case number DC-19-00250 filed by Stans Inc. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-9793049) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit: Consent, #2 Exhibit: Index of Matters Being Filed, #3 Exhibit: Index of State Court file, #4 Exhibit: State Court file, #5 Civil Cover sheet, #6 Supplemental Cover sheet, #7 Exhibit: COIP, #8 Exhibit: Disclosures) (Sargent, David) Modified jury demand on 2/21/2019 (mla). |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3. Wed Feb 20 15:00:39 CST 2019 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
