Von Colditz v. Woods et al
| Douglas R Oberhelman, Ursula M Burns, Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, Michael J Boskin, Rex W Tillerson, William C Weldon, William W George, Jeffrey J Woodbury, Steven S Reinemund, Samuel J Palmisano, Kenneth C Frazier, Darren W Woods, Larry R Faulkner, Andrew P Swiger, Henrietta H Fore and David S Rosenthal |
| Sarah Von Colditz |
| 3:2019cv01067 |
| May 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Other Statutes: Securities/Commodities/Exchange |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 INTERVENOR COMPLAINT Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Wast of Corporate Assets, and Unjust Enrichment against All Defendants filed by Sarah Von Colditz. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit(s) Verification of Plaintiff, #2 Exhibit(s) A, #3 Exhibit(s) B, #4 Exhibit(s) C, #5 Cover Sheet, #6 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Wells, Ronald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
