Ibekwe v. State Farm LLoyds et al
John Ibekwe |
State Farm Lloyds, Beckey Woodard, Robert Bess and David Ewald |
3:2019cv01088 |
May 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Jane J Boyle |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1446 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 ELECTRONIC ORDER finding as moot #4 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot #6 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot #7 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot #12 Motion to Remand; finding as moot #18 Motion to Strike; in light of the parties' pending settlement. See Doc. #23 , Notice of Settlement. The Clerk is directed to administratively close this case. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 6/28/2019) (chmb) |
Filing 24 ELECTRONIC ORDER: Plaintiff has accepted State Farm's Rule 68 Offer of Judgment. See Doc #23 , Notice of Settlement. As such, the parties are ordered to submit settlement papers by 8/26/19. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 6/28/2019) (chmb) |
Civil Case Administratively Closed per 25 Electronic Order. (ndt) |
Filing 23 NOTICE of Settlement filed by State Farm Lloyds (Harrell, D) |
Filing 22 REPLY filed by Robert Bess re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss (Harrell, D) |
Filing 21 REPLY filed by Beckey Woodard re: #6 MOTION to Dismiss (Harrell, D) |
Filing 20 REPLY filed by David Ewald re: #4 MOTION to Dismiss (Harrell, D) |
Filing 19 RESPONSE AND OBJECTION filed by State Farm Lloyds re: #12 MOTION to Remand (Opposed) (Harrell, D) |
Filing 18 MOTION to Strike #11 Amended Complaint and Supporting Brief filed by State Farm Lloyds with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Harrell, D) |
Filing 17 Appendix in Support filed by John Ibekwe re #16 Response/Objection to Defendant Bess' Motion to Dismiss (Kucera, Brennan) |
Filing 16 RESPONSE filed by John Ibekwe re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss (Kucera, Brennan) |
Filing 15 RESPONSE filed by John Ibekwe re: #6 MOTION to Dismiss (Kucera, Brennan) |
Filing 14 Appendix in Support filed by John Ibekwe re #13 Response/Objection to Defendant Ewald's Motion to Dismiss (Kucera, Brennan) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by John Ibekwe re: #4 MOTION to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Plaintiff's Appendix in Support of Response to Defendant Ewald's Motion to Dismiss) (Kucera, Brennan) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Remand (Opposed) filed by John Ibekwe (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Kucera, Brennan) |
Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by John Ibekwe. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Kucera, Brennan) |
Filing 10 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet by State Farm Lloyds. (Harrell, D) Modified docket text on 5/21/2019 (ajb). |
Filing 9 ELECTRONIC ORDER: Defendant State Farm Lloyds removed this case alleging improper joinder of several defendants. Doc. #1 . After reviewing the filings, the Court finds it appropriate to align Plaintiff's response deadline for the motions to dismiss (Docs. #4 , #6 , #7 ) with Plaintiff's response deadline for State Farm's improper-joinder argument. Responses should be filed on or before 6/3/2019; Defendants' replies will be due 14 days thereafter. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 5/13/2019) (chmb) |
Filing 8 Appendix in Support filed by Robert Bess re #7 MOTION to Dismiss (Rambin, W) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Robert Bess. Attorney W Neil Rambin added to party Robert Bess (pty:dft). (Rambin, W) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Beckey Woodard. Attorney W Neil Rambin added to party Beckey Woodard (pty:dft). (Rambin, W) |
Filing 5 Appendix in Support filed by David Ewald re #4 MOTION to Dismiss (Rambin, W) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss filed by David Ewald. Attorney W Neil Rambin added to party David Ewald (pty:dft). (Rambin, W) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by State Farm Lloyds. (Rambin, W) |
Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mla) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 134th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, TX, case number DC-19-04866 filed by State Farm Lloyds. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-9967645) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M) (Rambin, W) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.