Vance v. United States Department of Labor
| Cheryl E Vance |
| United States Department of Labor and US Postal Inspection Service |
| 3:2019cv01183 |
| May 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| A Joe Fish |
| Renee Harris Toliver |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Magistrate Judge's Questionnaire sent to Cheryl E. Vance. Responses due by 7/15/2019. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 6/21/2019) (rekc)
|
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Cheryl E Vance. Clerk to issue summons(es). Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Vance, Cheryl) |
|
Filing 7
Order and Notice of Deficiency: Cheryl E Vance must address the following deficiency: The complaint does not meet the basic pleading requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). Plaintiff is ORDERED to file an amended complaint that meets the pleading requirements of Rule 8(a) by 6/14/2019. A form complaint for use in civil cases ("Pro Se 1") is available online at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms. In the event Plaintiff has not already done so, she is also ORDERED to register for electronic filing through this Court's CM/ECF system, as required by Northern District of Texas Local Civil Rule 5.1(f), by 6/14/2019. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 5/24/2019) (axm)
|
| Filing 6 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #3 Complaint, by Plaintiff Cheryl E Vance. (Vance, Cheryl) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Fri May 17 11:07:29 CDT 2019 (crt) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Cheryl E Vance. (aaa) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Cheryl E Vance. (aaa) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against United States Department of Labor filed by Cheryl E Vance. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (aaa) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (aaa) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (aaa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
