Jeems v. City of Dallas
Cynthia Jeems |
City of Dallas |
3:2019cv01270 |
May 28, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
David C Godbey |
Renee Harris Toliver |
Civil Rights: Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 (AMENDED) RESPONSE filed by Cynthia Jeems re: #6 Order And Notice of Deficiency. (axm) |
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC ORDER: Plaintiff's response, Doc. #7 , is not signed as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(a). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to UNFILE it. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 7/1/2019) (chmb) |
Filing 7 ***UNFILED PER 8 ORDER*** RESPONSE filed by Cynthia Jeems re: #6 Order And Notice of Deficiency. (rekc) Modified on 7/1/2019 (mla). |
Filing 6 Order and Notice of Deficiency: Cynthia Jeems must address the following deficiency: Plaintiff is ordered to provide a sworn supplement to her motion to proceed in forma pauperis providing additional details about her monthly expenses. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 7/5/2019. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 6/14/2019) (ykp) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Fri Jun 14 16:55:22 CDT 2019 (crt) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Cynthia Jeems. (mla) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Cynthia Jeems. (mla) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against City of Dallas filed by Cynthia Jeems. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mla) |
Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (mla) |
Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mla) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Tue May 28 16:46:39 CDT 2019 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jeems v. City of Dallas | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Cynthia Jeems | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: City of Dallas | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.