Blankenbecler v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc
| Jerry Blankenbecler |
| DePuy Orthopaedics Inc |
| Special Master |
| 3:2019cv01365 |
| June 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Ed Kinkeade |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Case electronically transferred in from District of New Mexico; Case Number 1:19-cv-00150. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas should seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Copy of NEF to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed. |
| Filing 6 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-317) by JPML (certified copy) transferring this matter to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1407; assigned to the Honorable James Edgar Kinkeade (MDL 2244). (kg) [Transferred from New Mexico on 6/7/2019.] |
| Filing 5 Transmittal of State Court Documents by DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Record) (Baker, Douglas) [Transferred from New Mexico on 6/7/2019.] |
Filing 4
STIPULATED ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar GRANTING #3 Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Stay. (jcm) [Transferred from New Mexico on 6/7/2019.]
|
| Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION to Stay by DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.. (Baker, Douglas) [Transferred from New Mexico on 6/7/2019.] |
| Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (kdh) [Transferred from New Mexico on 6/7/2019.] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. from Second Judicial District Court, case number D-202-CV-2019-00113. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1)(Baker, Douglas) [Transferred from New Mexico on 6/7/2019.] |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number 1084-6296662 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Baker, Douglas) [Transferred from New Mexico on 6/7/2019.] |
| Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter and Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar assigned. (kdh) [Transferred from New Mexico on 6/7/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
