Obama v. Earle Cabell Federal Court et al
| Zaesliv H Obama and Shanta Y Claiborne |
| City of Dallas, City of Fort Worth, Earle Cabell Federal Court, Walmart and Dallas County Sheriff's Department |
| 3:2019cv01466 |
| June 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| David C Godbey |
| Renee Harris Toliver |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. No process will issue pending completion of screening. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 8/12/2019) (chmb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No: 8. Mon Aug 12 14:26:55 CDT 2019 (crt) |
| Filing 7 (Document Restricted) Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Zaesliv H Obama. (axm) Modified text on 7/8/2019 (epm). |
| Filing 6 (Document Restricted) Motion to Seal #7 Motion for IFP and #3 Prisoner's Civil Rights Complaint filed by Zaesliv H Obama. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s)) (axm) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5 with IFP Application. Tue Jun 25 08:53:36 CDT 2019 (crt) |
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY. Plaintiff Zaesliv H Obama must address the following deficiency: Plaintiff did not pay the required filing fee or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis on the court approved form. See 28 U.S.C. 1914, 1915(a). Therefore, Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay the required $400.00 filing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on the AO 239 form, by 7/16/2019. PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(b). A motion to proceed in forma pauperis on the AO 239 form (AO 239) is available online at http://www.txnd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/forms/AO239_0.pdf. No process will issue except upon order of the Court. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 6/24/2019) (chmb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No: 1, 2. Fri Jun 21 10:11:30 CDT 2019 (crt) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Zaesliv H Obama. (zkc) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against City of Dallas, City of Fort Worth, Dallas County Sheriff's Department, Earle Cabell Federal Court, Walmart filed by Zaesliv H Obama. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (zkc) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (zkc) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (zkc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
