Securities and Exchange Commission v. Plummer
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: Mark Allan Plummer
Case Number: 3:2019cv01538
Filed: June 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: A Joe Fish
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Securities/Commodities/Exchange
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 FINAL JUDGMENT: It is hereby further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED thatDefendant is liable for disgorgement of $399,011.19, representing profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon of $33,007.93, and a civil penalty of $75,000.00. Defendant shall satisfy these obligations by paying $50,000.00 to the SEC within 14 days after entry of this Final Judgment and the remaining $457,019.12 to the SEC within 364 days after entry of this Final Judgment. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 7/1/2019) (epm)
July 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Judgment. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 7/1/2019) (epm)
June 26, 2019 Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (aaa)
June 26, 2019 Filing 3 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Enter Final Judgment Against Defendant Mark Allan Plummer filed by Securities and Exchange Commission (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A-Consent, #2 Exhibit(s) B-Judgment) (Davis, Chris)
June 26, 2019 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Davis, Chris)
June 26, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mark Allan Plummer filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Filer fee note- Filed by the USA) Summons(es) not requested at this time. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Davis, Chris)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Plummer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Allan Plummer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Represented By: Chris Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?