Del Monte Fresh Produce NA Inc v. Fresh Produce Inc et al
Del Monte Fresh Produce N A Inc and Del Monte Fresh Produce NA Inc |
Fresh Produce Inc and Julio Nolasco |
3:2019cv01582 |
July 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Ed Kinkeade |
Other Statutes: Agricultural Acts |
07 U.S.C. ยง 499 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Substituted Service of Process. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 8/29/2019) (mla) |
Filing 9 MOTION Substituted Service of Process filed by Del Monte Fresh Produce NA Inc (Attachments: #1 Affidavit(s) of Due Diligence Conerning Fresh Produce, #2 Affidavit(s) of Due Diligence Conerning Julio Nolasco, #3 Proposed Order) (Kyser, Eric) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Eric Michael Kyser on behalf of Del Monte Fresh Produce NA Inc. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Kyser, Eric) |
Filing 7 ORDER denying #4 Motion to Waive Local Counsel Requirement. The Court DENIES the Motion without prejudice to refile and ORDERS Plaintiff to attach a Certificate of Conference to any amended motion seeking leave to proceed without local counsel. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 7/3/2019) (zkc) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Fresh Produce Inc, Julio Nolasco. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s)) (ndt) |
Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ndt) |
Filing 4 MOTION Waiver of Local Counsel filed by Del Monte Fresh Produce N.A., Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Amendola, Mark) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC ORDER: Local Rule 83.10(a) requires the appearance of local counsel where counsel of record for a party does not reside in this district. Accordingly, within twenty days of this date, plaintiff Del Monte Fresh Produce, N.A., Inc., shall file the entry of appearance of local counsel satisfying the requirements of Local Rule 83.10(a). Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this case without prejudice and without further notice. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 7/1/2019) (chmb) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Del Monte Fresh Produce N.A., Inc. identifying Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate Fresh Del Monte Produce, Inc. for Del Monte Fresh Produce N.A., Inc.. (Amendola, Mark) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fresh Produce, Inc., Julio Nolasco filed by Del Monte Fresh Produce N.A., Inc.. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-10087524) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Statement of Account, #2 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Amendola, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.